EVALUASI PROGRAM KINGDOM TRAINING DI LAPAS KELAS 1 CIPINANG JAKARTA TIMUR
Article Sidebar
CIPP,
Kingdom Training,
pemasyarakatan,
transformasi karakter program evaluation,
CIPP,
Kingdom Training,
correctional facility,
character transformation
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Kingdom Training Program implemented at the Class 1 Cipinang Correctional Facility, East Jakarta, using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product) developed by Stufflebeam. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through observation, semi-structured interviews with eleven purposively selected informants, and document analysis. The context evaluation shows that the program has clear and measurable goals that are aligned with the vision of the correctional institution and relevant to the participants’ needs. The input evaluation indicates that human resources, funding, training materials, and institutional support are in good condition, although challenges remain, such as the limited number of facilitators and minimal technology. The process evaluation shows that interactive training methods such as group discussions, simulations, and hands-on practice effectively increase participant engagement. The product evaluation reveals significant improvement in the spiritual, character, and social contribution aspects of participants, including repentance, involvement in ministry, and behavioral transformation. This study recommends strengthening facilitators, extending training duration, utilizing technology, and developing a more structured evaluation system to enhance the program’s impact. Kingdom Training has thus proven effective in shaping individuals who are spiritually and socially better, while contributing to the social reintegration process of inmates.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Adams, W. C. “Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews.” Dalam Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, diedit oleh Kathryn E. Newcomer, Harry P. Hatry, dan Joseph S. Wholey, 492–505. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2015.
Berger, R. “Now I See It, Now I Don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 15, no. 2 (2015): 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475.
Boulmetis, John, dan Phyllis Dutwin. ABC Evaluasi: Teknik Abadi untuk Manajer Program dan Proyek. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2011.
Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27–40.
Brandon, Paul R., dan Anna L. Ah Sam. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Chen, Huey-Tsyh. Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation, and Effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.
Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
Creswell, John W., dan Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
Deakin, Helen, dan Kelly Wakefield. “Skype Interviewing: Reflections of Two PhD Researchers.” Qualitative Research 14, no. 5 (2014): 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126.
Islamey, Ananda Ulima. “Hiruk Pikuk Pembebasan Napi di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19.” Diakses 22 Juni 2024. https://p2kk.umm.ac.id/id/pages/detail/artikel/hirukpikuk-pembebasan-napi-di-tengah-pandemi-covid19.html.
Janghorban, Roudi, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari, dan Ali Taghipour. “Skype Interviewing: The New Generation of Online Synchronous Interview in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 9, no. 1 (2014): 24152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152.
Lincoln, Yvonna S., dan Egon G. Guba. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, 1985.
Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, dan Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
Morrow, Susan L. “Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 52, no. 2 (2005): 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
Muchlis, Wildan Fauzi. “Dampak Over Kapasitas pada Lapas.” Diakses dari https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/pwkinternal–dampak-over-kapasitas-pada-lapas.
Orb, Angelica, Laurel Eisenhauer, dan Donna Wynaden. “Ethics in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 33, no. 1 (2001): 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Essentials of Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Minnesota: SAGE Publications, 2012.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2015.
Pillow, Wanda S. “Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16, no. 2 (2003): 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635.
Rossi, Peter Henry, Mark W. Lipsey, dan Howard E. Freeman. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004.
Roulston, Kathy, Kathleen deMarrais, dan Jamie B. Lewis. “Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences.” Qualitative Inquiry 9, no. 4 (2003): 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403252736.
Scriven, Michael. Evaluation Thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1991.
Spradley, James P. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. “The CIPP Model for Evaluation.” Dalam International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, diedit oleh Thomas Kellaghan dan Daniel L. Stufflebeam, 31–62. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L., dan Anthony J. Shinkfield. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007.
Worthen, Blaine R., dan James R. Sanders. Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman, 1987.